Since May this year I have been using Adobe Photoshop Elements 8 (PSE 8) which was given free with the Open University T189 Course. As a long-term fan of Adobe Photoshop Creative Suite (PSCS), to go over to PSE appeared to be a little of a backward step. A little like getting out of a Rolls Royce and trading it in for a Vauxhall. As PSE was supplied for the course and all the tutorials were based around PSE, I could have carried on with PSCS but I decided to keep to the course syllabus. It didn't take me long to discover that it really did have an advantage in some respects over PSCS. Imagine driving a McLaren F1 around central London for a week then swapping over and driving a Fiat 500 city car for a week.
PSCS Still has its place, but for the basic things you need for a photographer PSE is just fine. If you did your job right pre-shutter then there will be very little editing required anyway. Maybe just a little colour balance a little bit of dodge & burn, a little lighting adjustment.
This week, Adobe Photoshop Elements 9 has arrived and after I looked at its new features, I decided to give it a test run. The main feature that appealed to me was that I could automatically upload pictures to flickr. The program that flickr supply to upload pictures is at its best poor. It does what it says on the can, it uploads pictures to flickr but it’s slow.
The GUI has had a little tweak and I find it slightly better. In other reviews I have read people that have gone from PSE7 don’t like the GUI. To be fair, I hate the gui of PSE7 so maybe it’s one of those things you hate or love, nothing in-between.
On the list of new features are
· Instantly de-clutter and repair photos
· Match the style of a favourite photo automatically
· Create stunning pop art, reflections, portrait effects, LOMO camera style photography effects.
· Create richly layered photos using layer masks
· Quickly share photos and videos on Facebook
· Print calendars, cards, and photo books with your home printer
And some of the current items have been enhanced.
· Create fuller panoramas
· Edit raw image files for the highest quality results
· Share photos via fun Online Albums
· Use flexible layouts to create scrapbook pages, CD/DVD labels.
Some of the features and enhancements that have been added or improved, while handy to have, run against the grain as a professional photographer particularly a semi-pro who is still learning the trade. Are you going to take credit for work that is done in an auto or a program mode on your camera then run it through ‘auto fix everything’ on the computer? Use the features by all means, but you at least have to understand what the feature is doing for you and are able to do it manually. I always find the auto fix features never get it quite right anyway and it is still the same on PSE9. A computer can count pixels, compare and measure all it likes. It cannot understand the subject of your photograph, what you want from it or trying to portray in your photograph.
Adobe has now incorporated the ‘content aware’ spot healing brush from CS5, which is good news. The content aware brush was one of the few reasons I had for starting up PSCS for a photography work. In addition, ‘Camera RAW’ has been improved. PSE9 comes with Camera RAW 6.1, but you can download and install 6.2 if you like. It has no added functions just more compatibility.
As mentioned before, the ability to upload direct to flickr is a welcomed feature. It has all the features that the flickr-supplied program has, but it actually uploads a lot faster. The speed is obviously limited by your upload speed your ISP decides to offer, but those of you on a fast connection will notice the difference.
In all Adobe Photoshop Elements 9 is a good application for photographers. Photoshop CS is a little overkill for a photographers needs. Is it worth upgrading? I would say for a photographer, if you had version 7 or under, definitely yes. If you have version 8 unless you can get it under a student or education licence for £40 then maybe it is not worth the £75 you would have to stump up for it. If you are looking for a cut-price image-editing suite then with the addition of layer masks you could do no worse.
For me, yes, I will be upgrading from 8 to 9 just because of the ‘content aware’ brush and the upload to flickr. I hate the pop art type tools and I would never use them. Not unless I was producing images for a magazine or a website but then I would be using Photoshop CS5